Controversies in Ulster Presbyterianism, 1790-1836
I came across this very interesting essay.
posted by Timothy Davis | 1:42 pm
Ad Gloriam Dei
"Therefore, whether you eat or drink, or whatever you do, do all to the glory of God." - 1 Corintians 10:31
"Let us pursue the things which make for peace and those by which one may edify another"- Romans 14:19
"As iron sharpens iron, so a man sharpens the countenance of his friend." - Proverbs 27:17
"Endeavoring to keep the unity of the Spirit in the bond of peace... till we all come to the unity of the faith... speaking the truth in love..."
Ephesians 4:3,13,15
Recent Posts
- Belfast Happiest City in the U.K.
- Dodgy Spiders in Continental Europe
- Davis Family England Trip
- The Other Great Ejection
- Washington was an Anglican
- Thanksgiving to God and a Lament for William of Or...
- Encouragements to Faith (Ruth 1:8-22)
- Rowan Williams' Theology
- Church of Nigeria Stands Fast Against Williams' Co...
- The Command to Separate from Professed Unbelievers...
Archives
- April 2006
- May 2006
- June 2006
- July 2006
- August 2006
- September 2006
- October 2006
- November 2006
- December 2006
- January 2007
- February 2007
- March 2007
- April 2007
- May 2007
- June 2007
- July 2007
- August 2007
- September 2007
- November 2007
- December 2007
- April 2008
- May 2008
- June 2008
- July 2008
- August 2008
- September 2008
- October 2008
- December 2008
- March 2009
- September 2009
- January 2010
- May 2010
- July 2010
- August 2010
- June 2011
- November 2012
- June 2013
- December 2017
Links
- Bible
- Westminster Standards
- Alliance of Confessing Evangelicals
- Answers in Genesis
- The Christian Institute
- International Conference of Reformed Churches
- Reformed Presbyterian Church of Ireland
- Reformed Presbyterian Church of North America
2 Comments:
Does it have anything on the RPs in it, or is it just on the PCI?
Daniel,
The RPs are mentioned, but are more peripheral in this essay. The same author has an essay on an embarrassing episode in our Church's history here. Historic RPism would have held more strict opinions than modern RPs would agree with. This is not necessarily a reference to the aforementioned controversy as I haven't studied it sufficiently.
Post a Comment
<< Home